Mens Rea в уголовном праве Соединенных Штатов Америки
Шрифт:
218. Simons K.W. Book Review: Self-Defense, Mens Rea, and Bernhard Goetz // Columbia Law Review. N.Y., 1989. Vol. 89, № 5. P. 1179–1200.
219. Simons K.W. Mistake and Impossibility, Law and Fact, and Culpability: A Speculative Essay // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Baltimore (Md.), 1990. Vol. 81, № 1. P. 447–517.
220. Simons K.W. Rethinking Mental States // Boston University Law Review. Boston (Mass.), 1992. Vol. 72, № 3. P. 463–554.
221. Simons K. W. The Relevance of Community Values to Just Deserts: Criminal Law, Punishment Rationales, and Democracy // Hofstra Law Review. Hempstead (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 635–666.
222. Simons K.W. When is Strict Liability Just? // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Baltimore (Md.), 1997. Vol. 87, № 4. P. 1075–1137.
223. Singer R. The Model Penal Code and
224. Singer R., HusakD. Of Innocence and Innocents: The Supreme Court and Mens Rea Since Herbert Packer // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 1999. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 861–945.
225. Singer R.G. The Proposed Duty to Inquire as Affected by Recent Criminal Law Decisions in the United States Supreme Court // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 3, № 2. P. 701–754.
226. Singh R. U. History of the Defence of Drunkenness in English Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1933. Vol. 49, № 196. P. 528–546.
227. Smith A.T.H. Judicial Law Making in the Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1984. Vol. 100, № 1. P. 46–76.
228. Smith J.C. The Guilty Mind in the Criminal Law // The Law Quarterly Review. L., 1960. Vol. 76, № 301. P. 78–99.
229. Smith J.C. Two Problems in Criminal Attempts // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1957. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 422–448.
230. Stallybrass W.T.S. The Eclipse of Mens Rea II The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1936. Vol. 52, № 205. P. 60–67.
231. Stephen H. Homicide by Necessity // The Law Quarterly Review. L, 1885. Vol. 1, № 1. P. 51–61.
232. Stephen J.F. A Digest of the Criminal Law (Indictable Offences). 9th ed., by Lewis F. Sturge. L.: Sweet & Maxwell, Ltd., 1950. xlviii p., 580p.
233. Stephen J.F. A History of the Criminal Law of England. In Three Volumes. Vol. I. L.: MacMillan and Co., 1883. xv [iii] p., 576 p.
234. Stiles G.T. Comment, North Carolina’s Unconstitutional Expansion of an Ancient Maxim: Using DWI Fatalities to Satisfy First Degree Felony-Murder // Campbell Law Review. Buies Creek (N.C.), 1999. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 169–209.
235. Story J. Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution: In Three Volumes. Volume I. Boston: Hilliard, Gray and Company; Cambridge (Mass.): Brown, Shattuck, And Co., 1833. xxxiv p., 494 p.
236. Stuart D. Supporting General Principles for Criminal Responsibility in the Model Penal Code with Suggestions for Reconsideration: A Canadian Perspective // Buffalo Criminal Law Review. Buffalo (N.Y.), 2000. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 13–51.
237. Stubbs W. Select Charters and Other Illustrations of English Constitutional History from the Earliest Times to the Reign of Edward the First. 5th ed. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press, 1884. xii p., 552 + 36 p.
238. Sudduth T. Comment, The Dillon Dilemma: Finding Proportionate Felony-Murder Punishments // California Law Review. Berkeley (Cal.), 1984. Vol. 72, № 6. P. 1299–1327.
239. Sullivan G.R. Intent, Subjective Recklessness and Culpability // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Oxford, 1992. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 380391.
240. Swanson K.A. Case Notes, Criminal Law: Mens Rea and Well: Limiting Public Welfare Offenses – ln Re C.R.M. 11 William Mitchell Law Review. St. Paul (Minn.), 2002. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 1265–1282.
241. The Laws of the Earliest English Kings / Edited and Translated by F.L. Attenborough. N.Y.: Russell & Russell Inc., 1963. xii p., 256 p.
242. The Laws of the Kings of England from Edmund to Henry I / Edited and Translated by A.J. Robertson. Cambridge: At the University Press, 1925. xiii [i] p., 426 p.
243. The Supreme Court, 1986 Term // Harvard Law Review. Cambridge (Mass.), 1987. Vol. 101, № 1. P. 7–370.
244. Thomas, III, G.C. Realism About Rape Law: A Comment on
245. Thorne S.E. Fitzherbert’s Abridgement I I Law Library Journal. Chicago, 1936. Vol. 29, № 3. P. 59–63.
246. Tomkovicz J.J. The Endurance of the Felony-Murder Rule: A Study of the Forces that Shape Our Criminal Law // Washington and Lee Law Review. Lexington (Va.), 1994. Vol. 51, № 4. P. 1429–1480.
247. Travers M.L. Mistake of Law in Mala Prohibita Crimes // The University of Chicago Law Review. Chicago, 1995. Vol. 62, № 3. P. 1301–1331.