Почему Маркс был прав
Шрифт:
2. Цит. no Slavoj Ziiek, First as Tragedy, Then as Farce(London, 2009), p. 91.
3. Isaac Deutscher, The Prophet Armed: Trotsky 1879–1921(London, 2003), p. 373.
4. Alec Nove, The Economics of Feasible Socialism(London, 1983), David Schwe- ickart, Against Capitalism(Cambridge, 1993), and Bertell Oilman (ed.), Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists(New York and London, 1998). Более
5. Melvin Hill (ed.), Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World(New York, 1979), pp. 334–35.
6. Цит. no Robin Blackburn, Fin de Siede: Socialism after the Crash, New Left Re,no. 185 (January/February 1991), p. 29.
7. Pat Devine, Democracy and Economic Planning(Cambridge, 1988), David Mc, Against the Market(London, 1993), and Michael Albert, Parecon: Life After Capitalism(London, 2003). Сводное обобщение этой позиции можно найти в работе: Alex Callinicos, An Anti-Capitalist Manifesto(Cambridge, 2003), Ch. 3.
8. Cm.: Ernest Mandel, The Myth of Market Socialism, New Left Review,no. 169 (May/June 1988), p. 109 n.
9. Devine, Democracy and Economic Planning, pp.253,265–66.
10. Albert, Parecon,p. 59.
11. Raymond Wiliams, Communications(Harmondsworth, 1962).
Глава 3
1. Alex Callinicos (ed.), Marxist Theory(Oxford, 1989), p. 143.
2. Marx, Предисловие к A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy,в Marx and Engels: Selected Works(London, 1968), p. 182.
3. Наиболее убедительную защиту позиции Маркса можно найти в работе: G. А. Cohen, Marx's Theory of History: A Defence(Oxford, 1978). Это редкость, когда ошибочную идею так великолепно подают. Для отличной версии теории истории Маркса см.: S. Н. Rigby, Marxism and History(Manchester and New York, 1987), работу я здесь обсуждаю.
4. Alex Callinicos and Chris Harmon, The Changing Working Class(London, 1983), p. 13.
5. Marx, The Holy Family(New York, 1973), p. 101.
6. Marx & Engels, Selected Correspondence(Moscow, 1975), pp. 390–91.
7. Там же, pp. 293–94.
8. Замечания принадлежат John Maguire, Marx's Theory of Politics(Cambridge, 1978), p. 123.
9. Marx, Capital,vol. 1 (New York, 1967), p. 9.
10.
11. Цит. no Umberto Melotti, Marxism and the Third World(London, 1972), p. 6.
12. Marx, Theories of Surplus Value(London, 1972), p. 134.
13. Цит. no Alfred Schmidt, The Concept of Nature in Marx(London, 1971), p. 36.
14. Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures(London, 1992), p. 228.
Глава 4
1. В одном из лучших исследований представлена положительная интерпретация этой идеи, см.: Fredric Jameson, Archaeologies of the Future(London, 2005).
2. Marx and Engels, The German Ideology(London, 1974).
3. Marx, The Civil War in France(New York, 1972), p. 134.
4. Raymond Williams, Culture and Society 1780–19S0(Harmondsworth, 1985), p. 320.
5. Norman Geras, Marx and Human Nature: Refutation of a Legend(London, 1983).
6. Terry Eagleton, The Illusions of Postmodernism(Oxford, 1996), p. 47.
7. Cm.: Len Doyal and Roger Harris, The Practical Foundations of Human Under, New Left Review,no. 139 (May/June 1983).
8. Eagleton, The Illusions of Postmodernism.
9. Norman Geras, The Controversy about Marx and Justice, New Left Review,no. 150 (March/April 1985), p. 82.
10. Цит. no Norman Geras, The Controversy about Marx and Justice, New Left Review,no. 150 (March/April 1985), p. 52.
Глава 5
1. John Gray, False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism(London, 2002), p. 12.
2. Marx and Engels, Selected Correspondence(Moscow, 1965), p. 417.
3. Theodor W. Adorno, Negative Dialectics(London, 1966), p. 320.
4. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, A Discourse on Inequality(London, 1984), p. 122.
5. John Elliot Cairnes, Mr. Comte and Political Economy, Fortnightly Review(May 1870).
6. W. E. H. Lecky, Political and Historical Essays(London, 1908), p. 11.
7. Arthur Friedman (ed.), Collected Works of Oliver Goldsmith(Oxford, 1966), vol. 2, p. 338.
8. Для отличного обсуждения этой точки зрения см.: Peter Osborne, Marx(Lon, 2005), Ch.