Тайны пола. Мужчина и женщина в зеркале эволюции

Бутовская Марина Львовна

Baker R. R., Beilis М. А. 1995. Human sperm competition: copulation, masturbation, and infidelity. London. Chapman and Hall.

Blurton Jones N., Hawkes K., O’Connell J. F. 1999. Some current ideas about the evolution of the human life history. Comparative Primate Socioecology. Ed. Ph. Lee. Cambridge.

Bailey J. M., 1999. Homosexuality and mental illness. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. V. 56.

Barber N. 1999. Women’s dress fashions as a function of reproductive strategy. Sex Roles. V. 40.

Barber N. 2001. Mustache fashion

со-varies with a good marriage market for women. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior. V.24, №.4.

Bereczkei T, Dunbar R. 1997. Female-biased strategies in a Hungarian Gypsy population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series В. V. 264.

Bohum С. 1999. Hierarchy in the Forest. Cambridge Mass. 292 p.

Borgia G. Typology and human mate preferences. Response to D.Buss. 1989, Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989. V. 12

Brase G., Walker G. 2004. Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios. Human Nature V. 15. N°2.

Buss D. 1999. Evolutionary Psychology. Boston. Allan and Bacon. 456 p.

Buss D., Schmitt D. 1993. Sexual strategies theory: A contextual evolutionary analysis of human mating. Psychological Review. V. 100.

Buss D. M. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: the evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. and Brain Sci. V. 12.

Buss D. Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. The Journal of Sex.

Butovskaya M., Korotayev A., Kazankov A. 2000. Variabilite des relations sociales chez les primates humains et non humains: a la recherch? d un paradigme general. Primatologie. V. 3.

Butovskaya M. L., Demianovitsch A. N. 2002. Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation (SCBE-30) and Socialization Values (SVQ): Russian Children Ages 3 to 6 Years. Early Education and Development. V. 13, №2.

Campbell A. 1995. A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology. V.16.

Cartwright J. 2000. Evolution and human behaviour. London. Macmillan Press Ltd.

Chin E. 1999. Ethnically correct dolls: toying with the race industry American Anthropologist. V. 101, №2, p. 305-321.

Cronk L. 1989. Low socioeconomic status and female-biased parental investment: the Mukogodo example. American Anthropologist. V. 91, p. 414-429.

Cronk L.. 2000. Female-based parental investment and growth performance among the Makogodo. Adaptation and human behavior. L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, W. Irons eds. New York. Aldine de Gruyter. p. 203-222.

Daly, M., Wilson M. 1995. Discriminative parental solicitude and the relevance of evolutionary models to the analysis of motivational systems. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Ed. by M. Gazzaniga. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press, p. 1269-1286.

Dickemann M. 1989. Aggregates, averages, and behavioral plasticity. Response to D. Buss, 1989, Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. V.12, p. 19-20.

Eberhard W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by criptic feale choice. Princeton University Press.

Etcoff N. 1999. Survival of the prettiest. New York. Doubleday.

Fink B., Penton-Voak 1. 2002. Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science. V.l 1, №5.

Fink B., Grammer K., Thornhill R. 2001. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology V. 115, p. 92-99.

Fisher R.A. 1930/1958. The genetic theory of natural selection. New York. Dover.

Gandestad S., Thmhill R., Yeo R. 1994. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, V. 15, p.73-85.

Fisher H. E. 1989. Evolution of human serial pairbonding. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol. V. 78. p. 331-354.

Foley R.A. 1999. Hominid behavioural evolution: missing links in comparative socioecology. Comparative Primate Socioecology. Ed. Lee P. C. Cambridge, p. 363-386.

Friedl E. 1975. Women and Men. An Anthropologist's View. New York.

Gaulin R., Robbins C. 1991. Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary North American society. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, V. 85, p. 61-69.

Gottschall J., Martin J., Quish H., Rea J. 2004. Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales around the world and in historical European literature. Evolution and Human Behavior, V. 25, p. 102-112.

Hill K., Hurtado M. 1996. Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York.

Hladik C.M., Hladik A. 1990. Food resources of the rain forest. Food and Nutrition in the African Rain Forest. Eds. C.M.Hladik, S.Bahuchet, and 1. De Garine. Paris, p. 14-18.

HrdyS.B., 1999. Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection. N.Y.: Pantheon Books, 723 pp.

Low

В. S., 2000. Why sex matters. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Hughes S., Gallup G. 2003. Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior. V. 24, p. 173-178.

Irons W. Why do the Yomut raise more sons than daughters? Adaptation and human behavior. L. Cronk, N. Chagnon, W. Irons eds. New York. Aldine de Gruyter. p. 223-236.