Образ человека будущего, Том 7
Шрифт:
Future Human Image. Volume 7, 2017 47
Pedagogy of Peace and Philosophy of War: the Search for Truth by Serhiy Klepko
basic idea of military science, the art of war should be the wealth of every educated person as "impossible to be master in advanced mathematics of peaceful life, being poor in the arithmetic of war" [Pereslegin, 2013].
Only such strategic approach to education based on the philosophy of war fail to meet the requirements of the development of pedagogy of peace. In the future the shape of the peace education system will be depended not only on technological trends and strategies for mastering the sum of war and peace, but on how education will dare to be true for its subjects and its ability to explore in own content the boundary problems of social and personal life, particularly, the eternal human dream of peace, which is reflected in the continuous history of writing Treatise on perpetual peace [Treatise, 1963].
In this context, we note that under conditions of expanding of military confrontation and tensions, researches in "geophilosophy" in the world are intensified, too. Summarizing the intentions of various definitions of "geophilosophy" one can consider it as the search for man"s place in the world and the territory for him. Geophilosophy is a particular social or individual concept of conflict resolution as for truth and earthly being described by Ukrainian writer of the 19th century Panas Myrnyi in his work "Khiba revut" voly, yak yasla povni?" (In Ukrainian, 1880) "Do the Oxen Low When the Manger is Full": "Because no truth on the Earth... no good... and no land... gone!... The land was gone than all gone ... No land - no life" [Myrnyi, 1990]. Alienation of people from the truth and land, corruption of the land relations in society, including primitive functioning Land Cadastre in the modern Ukraine are the factors those rise geophilosophical discontentment, concentrated in aggressive behavior of many people. Therefore, for the philosophy of the pedagogy of peace is important to explore the complex of problems revealed by Heidegger in the relations between categories of "Alethea" and "Earth" in a comparative analysis of the concepts of "truth" and "untruth" [Miroshnikov, 2013].
References
Andrushchenko, Viktor. Pedagogy of Peace: Actuality of Theory and Practice. In Higher Edu-cation of Ukraine. 2, 2014: 5-12.
Barber, Michael. Brief Remarks on Education and the Causes of War. Moscow School of
Social and Economic Sciences. 12 December 2009.com/Barber-MosccommDec%2009.pdf.
Bazaluk, Oleg. The Theory of War and Peace: The Geophilosophy of Europe. Newcastle upon
Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017.
Bazaluk, Oleg. The Problem of War and Peace:
Bezkorovaina, Olena. Pedagogy of Peace: Definition, Tasks, Ways of Realization. In Pedago-gy of Tolerance. 3-4, 1999.
Demianchuk, Anatoliy, and Stepan Demianchuk. Theory of Teaching Pupils on the Ideas of
Peace. In Modernization of the Educational Content and Approaches in Schools. Rivne: RDGU, 2000: 149-197.
McGregor, Sue. Prospective Philosophical Foundations of Peace Education. In FactisPax. Vol.
8, N 2, 2014: 150-166.
Myrnyi, Panas. Do the Oxen Low When the Manger is Full? Kiev: Dnipro Publishers, 1990. Miroshnikov, Oleg. Categories of "Aletheia" and "Ground" in the Philosophy of M Heidegger.
In Culture of the Greater Black Sea Area Peoples. 254, 2013: 213-216.
48 Future Human Image. Volume 7, 2017
Pedagogy of Peace and Philosophy of War: the Search for Truth by Serhiy Klepko
National Report on the Status and Prospects of Education Development in Ukraine. National
Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. Edited by V. G. Kremen et. al. Kyiv: Peda-hohichna dumka, 2016.
Nipkow, Karl Ernst. Der schwere Wegzum Frieden: Geschichte und Theorie der Friedensp"ad-agogik von Erasmus bis zur Gegenwart. G"utersloh: G"utersloherVerl.
– Haus, 2007.
Page, James Smith. Peace Education: Exploring Ethical and Philosophical Foundations.
Charlotte, NC: Inform. Age Pub, 2008.
Pedagogy of Peace in the Secondary and High Schools: Paper presented at conference. In
Honor of the 70th Anniversary of Academician and Professor S. Ya. Demianchuk. Dec.
29-30, 1995, Rivne.
Pereslegin, Sergey. Sum of Strategy. Saint-Petersburg, 2013.sites/default/files/Summa_Strategia-1.pdf.
Suvorova, Dina. Education in the Spirit of Peace in the USA and Germany: Genesis and a Modern State. Kursk, 2008.
The Education and the Fate of Nation. Philosophy and Pedagogy of Peace in Ukraine and in the Modern World: ХV International Scientific-Practical Conference (28-29th October 2016). G. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University. Kharkov: KhNPU,
2016.
Treatise on Perpetual Peace. Edited by I. S. Andreeva and A. V. Gyliga. Moscow: Sotsekgiz,
1963.
Future Human Image. Volume 7, 2017 49
Cosmic Humanity: Utopia, Realities, Prospects
Sergey Krichevsky - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Institute of the History of Science and Technology named after S. I. Vavilov
(Moscow, Russia)
E-mail: [email protected]
The philosophical foundations of the theory and practice of the creation of cosmic humanity as a process of the evolution of human civilization, the emergence into space, with the prospect of resettlement outside the Earth are considered. There is a connection between myths, fantasies, ideas, concepts and projects aimed at the exploration of outer space, the creation of cosmic humanity. A new and voluminous definition of cosmic humanity in the evolutionary paradigm is given. Cosmic humanity is (essence and 4 stages of evolution): 1. Humanity living on Earth, sensing, knowing, understanding its cosmic origin, relationship with the cosmos and cosmic destiny. 2. Humanity living on Earth, leading aerospace activity for the purposes of exploration and use of aerospace space (Heaven, Space) for survival and develop-ment. 3. Humanity living on Earth and outside the Earth - in the solar system, preserving the Earth and mastering the Cosmos for survival and development. 4. Humanity, settled and living in the Cosmos. Now humanity is in the process of transition from the second to the third stage. In the process of this evo-lution, a complex transformation of man and society takes place. The problem-semantic field of cosmic humanity is described and its general model is presented. The meta-goal-setting is the justification of cosmic humanity with the application of the anthropic principle and its "active" super (post) anthropic supplement: "Cosmic humanity has an evolutionary purpose to actively manage evolution: change man, humanity and the universe." The evolution of the "cosmic dream", goals and technologies of space ac-tivities is formalized in the form of a conceptual model. Challenges and negative trends are considered in connection with the crisis of space activity, criticism and attempts to limit the flights of people into space. The prototype of cosmic humanity, its basis and acting model is the cosmonauts" community. The main characteristics and tendencies of the development of the world cosmonaut community for 55 years of spaceflight, indicators of national competitions in selecting cosmonauts as indicators of the society"s attitude to cosmonautics and the cosmic future of humanity are given. The main results, consequences and prospects of spacewalk in the context of the evolution of technology, human and humanity, including the main potentialities, challenges and threats caused by technical development, the creation of a posthu-man, etc., are considered. The description and analysis of the social mega-project of the new space state ASGARDIA, which is created since October 2016 and is the institutional basis of cosmic humanity, is giv-en. In fact, it is a state for the future of cosmic humanity, which has already begun (itself) to be organized on Earth. There is a process of transformation of the almost fantastic and superglobal utopia of the first in the history of the earthly civilization of the cosmic state of people - the "cosmic international" - into the reality of a fundamentally new social contract. The idea and the project of the space state is exactly what was lacking for the process of space expansion to go seriously: a new geocosmopolitan subject and an actor who is interested in space exploration (including resettlement in it in the long run) as in its main goal and overarching goal, and Focused on this process. The first results of the project are encouraging. An interesting sociological model is being created, based on an analysis of the statistical relationships of the present earthly and promising cosmic humanity. The first, unique, but important and unique "cosmic referendum" on the Earth is being held. The characteristics of the state being created are shown, citizens