Политическая наука №3 / 2017. Советские политические традиции глазами современных исследователей
Шрифт:
Arthur W.B. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. – Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan press, 1994. – xx, 201 p.
Berger P., Luckmann Th. Social construction of reality. – N.Y.: Doubleday, 1967. – 467 p.
Boas T.C. Conceptualizing continuity and change // Journal of theoretical politics. – L.; Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007. – Vol. 19, N 1. – P. 33–54.
Bridges A. Path dependence, sequence, history, theory // Studies in American political development. – Cambridge, 2000. – Vol. 14, N 1. – P. 109–112.
Carden A. Inputs and institutions as conservative elements // Review of Austrian economics. – Boston, 2009. – Vol. 22, N 1. – P. 1–19.
Collier R.B., Collier D. Framework: Critical junctures and historical legacies // Collier R.B., Collier D. Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement and regime dynamics in Latin America. – Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 1991. – P. 27–39.
Czarniawska B. A theory of organizing. – Cheltenham: Elgar, 2008. – 176 p.
David P.A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY // American economic rev. – Pittsburgh. – PA, 1985. – Vol. 75, N 2. – P. 332–337.
David P.A. Path dependence, its critics and the quest for
David P.A. Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science // Cliometrica. – Boston; N.Y., 2007. – Vol. 1, N 2. – P. 91–114.
De Rond M., Thietart R.-A. Choice, chance and inevitability in strategy // Strategic management journal. – Hoboken, NJ, 2007. – Vol. 28, N 5. – P. 535–551.
Garud R., Kumaraswamy A., Karnoe P. Path dependence or path creation? // J. of management studies. – Hoboken, NJ, 2010. – Vol. 47, N 4. – P. 760–774.
Liebowitz S.J., Margolis S.E. Path dependence // The new Palgrave dictionary of economics and law / Ed. by P. Newman. – L.: Macmillan, 1998. – P. 17–23.
Mahoney J. Path dependence in historical sociology // Theory and society. – Boston; Dordrecht, 2000. – Vol. 29, N. 4. – P. 507–548.
Mahoney J. Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective // Studies in comparative international development. – Boston; N.Y., 2001. – Vol. 36, N 1. – P. 111–141.
Mahoney J., Schensul D. Historical context and path dependence // The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis / Ed. by R.E. Goodin, Ch. Tilly. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2006. – Ch. 24. – P. 454–471.
North D.C. Institutional change: A framework of analysis // Institutional change: Theory and empirical findings / Ed. by S.-E. Sj"ostrand. – N.Y.: Sharpe, 1993. – P. 35–46.
Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics // American political science review. – Cambridge, 2000. – Vol. 94, N 2. – P. 251–267.
Rixen T., Viola L. Uses and abuses of the concept of path dependence: Notes toward a clearer theory of institutional change // International summer school on the logic of self-reinforcing processes in organizations, networks and markets. – B.: Freie Universit"at Berlin, 2009. – 13–17 July. – P. 1–27.
Schwartz H. Path dependence, increasing returns and historical institutionalism: Unpublished manuscript. – 2004. – Mode of access:(Accessed: 23.11.2016.)
Stinchcombe A. Constructing social theories. – N.Y.: Harcourt Brace, 1968. – 303 p.
Thelen K. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics // Annual rev. of political science. – Palo Alto, CA, 1999. – Vol. 2. – P. 369–404.
Thelen K. How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis // Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences / Ed. by J. Mahoney, D. Rueschemeyer. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. – P. 208–240.
Vergne J.P., Durand R. The missing link between the theory and empirics of path dependence // Journal of management studies. – Hoboken, NJ, 2010. – Vol. 47, N 4. – P. 736–759.
Ракурсы:
Обживая руины советской системы: К вопросу о российском неопатримониализме 25
25
Статья подготовлена в рамках исследовательского проекта «Исследование взаимоотношений власти и общества в России в ракурсе политической онтологии», осуществляемого при поддержке Российского гуманитарного научного фонда (проект № 15-03-00008 а).
Аннотация. Рассматриваются проблемы социально-политических трансформаций в России в конце 1980-х – начале 2000-х годов. Анализируются исторические развилки, прохождение которых обусловило катастрофу советского государства и становление неопатримониализма в постсоветской России. Режимная трансформация на рубеже 1990–2000 гг. интерпретируется как преодоление критической фазы постсоветского развития и наступление исторически длительного этапа, характеризующегося достижением относительного баланса между иерархией и сетями, формальными и неформальными институтами, агентностью и структурой.
26
Ефременко Дмитрий Валерьевич, доктор политических наук, заместитель директора Института научной информации по общественным наукам Российской академии наук, e-mail: [email protected]
Efremenko Dmitry, Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia), e-mail: [email protected]
Ключевые слова: распад СССР; неопатримониализм; критические моменты; формальные и неформальные институты; структура; агентность; политическая онтология.
Abstract. The article considers issues of social and political transformations in our country in the late 1980 s – early 2000 s. It analyzes the historical forks in the road that determined the catastrophe of the Soviet state and the establishment of neopatrimonialism in post-Soviet Russia. Political transformation of 1990–2000 is interpreted as a negotiation of the critical phase of post-Soviet development and the onset of a historically long stage characterized by a relative balance between hierarchy and networks, formal and informal institutions, agency and structure.