Port Arthur town of Knights of Round Table
Шрифт:
***
But this old conflict had some hidden stories and facts and secrets.
There were not plenty poems about this as patriotic poem to up, as usual style of any war, and just one poem had been known.
(Please, compare to poems of WWII times and poems during Port Arthur battles).
May be, some Russian felt as wrong to attack other lands of another country? As Jesus Christis asked never to take other people property in own pocket?
But it was some more hidden secrets and some secret information.
The fight for a town named as Port Arthur in a name of some British man? a Noble British man? British? English-speaking man from far away country?
Russian town Ekaterenburg, Peterburg were on names of Russian Royalty, - Russian Tsarina Ekaterina II, Russian Tsar Peter The Great, people, whom ruled as a main power.
Look, this is a great misery, mistic story to see to find a huge loss of Russian military Army and Navy staff as a fight for whom, really? For a town of Arthur? Port Arthur town? named to honor some ENGLISH-SPEAKING MAN FROM ENGLAND? British man?
Military people, The Artmy, The Fleet, they fight always for their own state, country, for their own TOP POLITICIANS IN POLITICAL POWER.
This fight of Russian military men and Russian navy men for a town Port Arthur as for their own town with name of their own country and state, had oppened a hidden secret of some hidden history about some state and a country where Arthur was a name of the Top Politician, ruled as Royal.
This mark and sign of some hidden fact when Russian and English speakers were being citizens of some huge Empair with their KIng Arthur or Emparator Arthur.
So, British people saved this fact in British legends about King Arthur, while no evedences of his grave, graves of his closed families, relatives, half-sisters, kids, nephews, castles of ruins of castles, no evedences of his decendents or decendents of his closed relatives till present time.
Plenty people listend legends of King Arthur, Wizard Merlin, Knights of Round Table, Caliburn, sword, Excaliburn, Guienevere, his wife. his son Mordred from Morgana, his half-sister.
The island England is not a huge place ot be able to search it to find ruins of castles or castles, Christian cemetery, graves.
Plenty locals lived in some places for centuries, making graves locally in their local cemeteries near churches and inside churches for Nobles, riches, and priests.
All graves now searched to make DNA genetic testing, this common for all.
It would be suprising to find a loss of memory of a place of grave of a famous King Arthur as King on England and King of British tribes and a loss of location of graves of all his relatives too.
We may easy find Roman Empair buildings, colones in island England for a time more deep in the past, saving, known locations. And ... no information for King Arthur and his relatives graves in British people memory or legend stories?
But may be this a point that KIng Arthur was a real man living in some another land far away from island England? so, his grave and his relatives graves were being not in island England?
We all know, for example, legends of Chingis Khan, as he worried to hide his grave from others.
By legends of historicans, Chingis Khan ruled Russians, Slavs during 300 years.
Russian genetic study had not finded traces of this mystic rules of Mongolians in local Russian genes of Russian men and Russian women.
Russian men had their YDNA as R1.... not as Mongolian YDNA types, shown no evedences in genetic tracing for any "Mongolian Power Invasian of Russia during 300 years".
Look, any men had a sex with some women, more riches powerfull and ... no evedences of sex Mongolian men with local Slavonic women during 300 years, while all Historician drew pictures of men on horses, a wild men, liking food, women, money, fightings.
300 years of such powerful rule and no any kids? no boys? no girls? no children? no condoms? and so, no sex of men in a wild character, on horses?
If some army came in your country, with plenty men, they defenetly would had a sex with some local females, living their kids from them.
But if they teached you this, and genetic study show clearly NO EVEDENCES of any genetic traces of presence of "some men coming abroad in a huge amount in the past", you see, some one lied and lie to you, saying "the local history facts and events" as "the local official stories" and "the history".
Your conclusions may be that
1. or the official history lied saying a lie to you and all, hidding the real history facts
1A. But if so, a curiosity to find a real history facts and events? to know the truth as this was all?
2. or the official history saved the real history facts but for people whom had lived here before you and dissapired suddenly all in one day, nobody left, to make the genetic traces in DNA to prove their old real history.