Герменевтика
Шрифт:
Б. Транскультурная передача библейских заповедей.
1. Как можно точнее определите принцип, стоящий за поведенческой заповедью.
2. Изучив причину, по которой установлен принцип, определите, является ли принцип неограниченным во времени или ограниченным (транскультурным или эндемокультурным).
3. Если принцип является транскультурным, определите, будет ли поведенческое применение в нашей культуре так же адекватно и точно выражать этот принцип, как и в библейские времена.
4. Если поведенческое выражение
Приложения
Приложение А
Barrett, C. K. «The Interpretation of the Old Testament in the New Testament.» In The Cambridge History of the Bible. Vol. 1, ed. P. R. Ackroyed and C. F. Evans. Cambridge: University Press, 1970, pp. 377-411. The author believes that the New Testament authors borrowed both legitimate and illegitimate hermeneutical principles from their contemporary culture.
Bartsch, Hans. Kerygma and Myth. 2 vols. London: S. P. C. K., 1962-64. A discussion of Scripture from the perspective of the «New Hermeneutics."
Childs, B. S. Biblical Theology in Crisis. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1970. A discussion of the American neoorthodox theology movement by one of its members.
Hasel, G. Old Testament Theology: Basic Issues in the Current Debate. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1972. Although not a book on hermeneutics explicitly, this book points out the central issues that distinguish various schools of interpretation.
Marle, Rene. Introduction to Hermeneutics. New York: Herder and Herder, 1967. A general text written from a liberal perspective.
Palmer, R. E. Hermeneutics. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1969. Excellent text on the «New Hermeneutics».
Von Rad, G. «Typological Interpretation of the Old Testament.» In Essays on Old Testament Hermeneutics, ed. J. L. Mays. Richmond: Knox, 1963, pp. 17-39. An example of typological theory by one who believes that the Old Testament is a product of documentary development, a human recounting of God's actions, and that therefore it cannot be trusted as either reliable or accurate.
Приложение Б
Baillie, John. The Idea of Revelation in Recent Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 1956. Neoorthodox perspective.
Beegle, Dewey M. The Inspiration of Scripture. Philidelphia: Westminster Press, 1963. An evangelical who denies inerrancy.
Boice, James Montgomery. The Foundation of Biblical Authority. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978. A series of lectures prepared by contributors to the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy.
Bruce, F. F. The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? Chicago: Inter Varsity, 1960. Excellent treatment of the subject by a prominent evangelical scholar.
Brunner, Emil. Revelation and Reason. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1946. A Neoorthodox approach.
Childs, B. S. Biblical Theology in Crisis. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1970. A discussion of the American Neoorthodox movement by one of its members.
Dodd, C. H. The Authority of the Bible. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1929. A liberal perspective.
Geisler, Norman. Inerrancy. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1980.
Fuller, Daniel.
Fuller, Daniel and Pinnock, Clark. «On Revelation and Biblical Authority.» Christian Scholar's Review. A short discussion by these two well-known contemporary theologians on the issue of «limited inerrancy."
Henry, Carl F. H. God, Revelation and Authority. 4 vols. to date. Waco, Tex.: Word, 1976.
Hodge, Archibald A. and Warfield, Benjamin B. Inspiration. 1881. Reprint. Grand Rapids: Baker; 1979.
Lindsell, Harold. The Battle for the Bible. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1976. This book traces the history of the debate between biblical errancy and inerrancy, and describes the doctrinal changes in groups that have adopted an errant Scripture position.
________. The Bible in the Balance. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979 or 1980.
McDonald, H. D. Theories of Revelation: A Historical Study, 1700-1960. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1979.
Montgomery, John W., ed. God's Inerrant Word: An International Symposium on the Trustworthiness of Scripture. Minneapolis: Bethany, 1974. An excellent volume from the conservative evangelical perspective. See especially the chapters by Montgomery, Pinnock, and Sproul.